SimPlan AG

Hello everyone, the training courses are "in principle" too full of teaching material, so that even if no questions arise or no explanations are needed, it is not possible to cover everything sufficiently in the three days allocated. This is, of course, assuming that participants have programming/simulation skills. There should be no objection to increasing the basic and remaining training courses to a minimum of four full days, and it is clear that the course fee would therefore be adjusted accordingly. Therefore, the price/performance ratio is not appropriate at this time. However, companies that would like to use this training and software, especially for basic training, report that the training material was completely covered and understood, and that any questions that arose were addressed and the answers understood.
There were only three of us in the course and we attended the training on the first day until 6 p.m., on the second day from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., and on the third day from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. This meant that on day one, it was already clear that the amount of material could not be covered in the regular training time. Unfortunately, this is a huge negative aspect, which is particularly counterproductive in the area of learning/training. The product plan simulation is a very interesting product and arouses interest in more. Kind regards, Christian Kehl

Hello, Overall, the training was very good and the material was conveyed very well through both the lecture and the accompanying exercises. However, I feel that the course was too short for the scope of the training. It would be desirable to extend the course by one day in the future, given the amount of material covered. The time we had here was simply too short.
Approximately 380 presentation slides, including several exercises, in three days is simply too much. Best regards

The course instructor, Mr. Bott, always took the time to answer a wide range of questions and did everything he could to answer them or work out a solution together.
This made the lessons more tangible and the knowledge taught could flow directly into personal use cases.

The teaching material was very well prepared and the teaching units built on each other well and had a reasonable difficulty curve.

It should be noted that the 3 days scheduled for the basic course are a little short for the wealth of teaching material, especially if more questions are asked.

Bonus point: a kind of cheat sheet with the most important keyboard shortcuts, data input fields, data types and syntax of the programming language as a handout would have been helpful.

We were in very good hands with SimPlan. Everyone was very friendly and helpful. The training itself could be more geared towards enabling people to use the tool themselves. Often you just had to rework.

The training is informative and practical. The content is very interesting. During the implementation, there were times when I was mainly trying to copy the code and less time to understand what we were doing. But I still think it's important for learning. The teacher shared a lot of his experience and described examples from the industry. He is very open and answered all questions.
The room was fine, unfortunately there was no fruit, more choice of drinks and better cookies should be included in the price of the training.

Communication of comprehensive content
Questions were always answered
Very good introduction to the logistics building block box

During the training, the basics of PlantSimulation were taught in an understandable and practical way. It was an all-round successful event and a lot of fun!

Fast and competent solutions and rapid implementation.

The trainer Stephan Mikes was able to convey the content very well in a pleasant environment. This made it easy to systematically understand the connections. Many thanks again to Stephan at this point.

- Structured way of working
- Flexibility in the event of changes to the project scope and delays
- Personal support for detailed questions about software and simulation models
- Clean documentation of the project and source code
- Possibility to actively contribute to the models as a client

Many thanks to Mr. Mikes for offering the hybrid training due to the flooding situation in Regensburg. Participating online was a challenge in itself, but Mr. Mikes did a great job. I also think the consultation offer afterwards is very good and will gladly take advantage of it.

Very nice and competent manner. They responded flexibly to our availability.

The support provided by Mr. Kaufhold was once again a very pleasant, technically experienced and overall very positive experience. Many thanks for the excellent cooperation

Very unproblematic supplier. Always responded to changes, requests, etc. openly and without additional costs or similar. Very professional. Helped the project significantly. Was always available.

Great company!

-uncomplicated coordination of open questions/points
-extended "desk": good cooperation
-Comprehensible preparation of the simulation model
-Joint evaluation/analysis of the simulation results leads to quick insights into the influencing factors

It is important that the trainers have extensive experience with the use of Plant Simulation in the industry, even if it is basic training. I would say at least 5 years. That was the case with my trainer.

The trainers responded very well to individual questions and problems, imparting knowledge beyond the actual content of the training and presenting solutions using spontaneous examples.